Lyons is just one of hundreds of North Carolinians who have turned out at statewide public meetings over the last couple of months to express concern about Duke Energy’s Carbon Plan proposal, which needs approval from state regulators to go forward.  

“I don’t want to pay more for more pollution,” says Lyons. “Duke is guaranteed a profit, while we are guaranteed dirtier air, a less safe climate and a higher cost of living.” 

And if price and pollution wasn’t enough, having an electricity grid that relies so heavily on fossil fuels has also proven to be a reliability risk.  

Two years ago on Christmas Eve, half a million North Carolinians lost power during rolling blackouts that darkened streets normally ablaze with holiday lights and left families feeling anything but cozy and cheerful. The Grinch? Failures at gas and coal plants.  

The blackouts, as the utility later testified, were in large part due to frozen fossil units and instrumentation, software failures, and technology glitches. The federal investigation of the blackout found that problems ran all the way up the gas supply chain, meaning that the reliability of Duke’s gas plants, and of power supply for North Carolinians, are increasingly vulnerable to disruption and reliant on factors beyond Duke’s control.  

So why is Duke doubling down on dirty power? In short, because they can. And the system is set up so that the more money Duke spends, the more money Duke makes.  

“There’s no free market for electricity in North Carolina,” says Will Scott, southeast climate and clean energy director at Environmental Defense Fund, which is working to stop Duke’s massive investment in dirty power. “With no meaningful competitor to provide customers the option to choose a different energy provider, Duke dominates the market. The company’s expensive investment plans are entirely in line with what should be expected from a profit-seeking monopoly utility taking advantage of a captive customer-base. Ratepayers are on the hook for every penny of cost and every ounce of risk.”  

EDF and others are calling on Duke to scale back its gas plans and ramp up investment in clean energy. North Carolina is already among the top five solar producers in the country and has vast untapped offshore wind resources. There are three offshore wind areas off the coast of North Carolina already leased to wind energy developers and ready to go. Analysis shows that these areas could be providing the state with clean energy within just six years.  

And North Carolina’s offshore wind areas are predicted to generate the most power at night and during the winter, times when the state experiences peak demand.  

Investing in renewables instead of fossil fuels could also give ratepayers some relief. In Virginia, for example, offshore wind energy projects are projected to save electricity customers $300 million in fuel costs per year — over $3 billion in total during their first decade of operation.  

North Carolina state regulators are expected to rule on Duke’s proposal by the end of 2024. Their decision will shape over $100 billion in long-term investments proposed by Duke Energy, and ultimately largely paid for by North Carolina electricity customers.  

“This is a huge decision point for the future of North Carolina,” says Scott. “An affordable, clean energy future is at our fingertips. We have to seize it before it’s too late.”